
Now, the cover speaks (as did housedress patterns up through about 1960) directly to the use of this pattern. The young lady on the cover, the biggest illustration, is washing dishes. Ah – this is a clever take on a housedress, but something done as a wrap-around jumpsuit and if you made it in something a bit more interesting or chic than ‘housedress cotton’, you could get something that you could lounge around in – hence the use of the term ‘pajamas’ (which at that time were seen as loungewear for women and were even worn at the beach!). So, our young lady in her ‘kitchenette apartment’ (all very independent and obviously making enough scratch in 1930 during the Great Depression that she could have an apartment, even if she had to share it with the other two girls on the cover of the pattern who seem to be having a private conversation there in the background) is finished with work and is doing her washing up.
So, here are some of the fiddly bits to this pattern:
1) This to me is sort of weird, given that 1930 was in the depths of the Great Depression and people were squeezing every penny — this pattern takes a LOT of fabric. I made this first as a muslin and then pulled out 3 yards of rayon poly something (it’s not challis but more like a crepe) that is at least 45″ wide. I’m short – only 5’2″ and I am used to being able to get a skirt out of a yard of 45″ wide fabric. Both times, I have faced running out of fabric and having to do something clever. In this case, I went through the stash and found some pink poly lining that matched one of the little illustrations in what I think is called ‘conversational print’ of this navy blue fabric. So, do yourself a favor – add a yard to the yardage estimates on the pattern to make this, unless you’ve already decided to make it two colors.
2) I am short. So is this pattern. I made this pattern as/is out of the envelope. I did not shorten anything and it fits me perfectly. See the ladies on the cover with their pumps on with their pajamas? Mine hit me at the same point. So, if you are going to make this pattern, do make yourself a muslin and be prepared to make both the top half longer (split it at the waist marks and add paper); ditto on the leg portions. yes, there is a lot of ease in this pattern but ease goes around – I think anyone who is taller than 5’4″ is going to need to lengthen this in more than one spot.
3) One of the issues with this (and frankly with any wrap-around pattern — see “Dress, Walk-Away”) is that the only ‘points of control’ are the ties. As you can see with the illustration: 

Other Fiddly Details
The difference between “I just wear this to bed” and “Come over for drinks” is in the details. First, as mentioned before, is fabric choice. The nicer and heavier the fabric is, the more formal and ‘chic loungewear’ this will look. Second, is color choices; one long drape of color looks more formal than breaking it up as a two-color exercise. Third are construction items:

The second items are the edges of the back bodice which cross over one another. The pattern calls for them to be ironed over and sewn down but depending on what sort of fabric you use for this, that might not give you the effect you want. The fabric I’m using has a tendency to stretch on the bias (which the direction of the back bodice edge produces in a curved sort of way). Since we are going to be pulling against the edge with those ties, I figured that I needed to stabilize that edge, which I did with lightweight fusible interfacing and then I bound it with bias strips of the pink lining fabric.
Next up: The Front.


