<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cooking Turkey: Accomplishments and the Tyranny of Lists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kitchencountereconomics.com/2009/09/12/696/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kitchencountereconomics.com/2009/09/12/696/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 00:58:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn</title>
		<link>http://www.kitchencountereconomics.com/2009/09/12/696/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitchencountereconomics.com/?p=696#comment-161</guid>
		<description>I agree with Shannon, although I&#039;m not particularly OCD or Type A. I think lists just help me put some structure into my day/week/month and help me plan out my life a little bit better than if I were just relying on habit or willpower to get me to do things. If I sit down and contemplate all the things I need to do + all the things I want to do, I tend to get overwhelmed, but if I can look at a list and break things down into smaller, digestible portions, it&#039;s easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Shannon, although I&#8217;m not particularly OCD or Type A. I think lists just help me put some structure into my day/week/month and help me plan out my life a little bit better than if I were just relying on habit or willpower to get me to do things. If I sit down and contemplate all the things I need to do + all the things I want to do, I tend to get overwhelmed, but if I can look at a list and break things down into smaller, digestible portions, it&#8217;s easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.kitchencountereconomics.com/2009/09/12/696/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitchencountereconomics.com/?p=696#comment-160</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a list maker - always have been, always will be.  Although I don&#039;t always manage to make it through the list, checking everything off as I go, I do usually get a bunch of it done and that gives me a sense of accomplishment.  I think some people are weighed down by lists and others are set free - I am firmly in the second category.  I think it all comes down to your basic personality type - my type is typically the obsessive compulsive, neat freak, organizational wacko type, so it works for me!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a list maker &#8211; always have been, always will be.  Although I don&#8217;t always manage to make it through the list, checking everything off as I go, I do usually get a bunch of it done and that gives me a sense of accomplishment.  I think some people are weighed down by lists and others are set free &#8211; I am firmly in the second category.  I think it all comes down to your basic personality type &#8211; my type is typically the obsessive compulsive, neat freak, organizational wacko type, so it works for me!  <img src='http://www.kitchencountereconomics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby Wollin</title>
		<link>http://www.kitchencountereconomics.com/2009/09/12/696/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby Wollin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 01:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitchencountereconomics.com/?p=696#comment-159</guid>
		<description>If it works for you, Carolyn - that is great! I have made lists over the years and have felt defeated a lot of the time. What I&#039;m doing works for me - what you do works for you. Either way, we are both getting some stuff done that we feel is important and that is the important thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it works for you, Carolyn &#8211; that is great! I have made lists over the years and have felt defeated a lot of the time. What I&#8217;m doing works for me &#8211; what you do works for you. Either way, we are both getting some stuff done that we feel is important and that is the important thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn</title>
		<link>http://www.kitchencountereconomics.com/2009/09/12/696/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitchencountereconomics.com/?p=696#comment-157</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree &lt;i&gt;vociferously&lt;/i&gt;. I made one of these lists a month ago, and I&#039;m slowly but steadily crossing things off, and about 20% of the tasks are things that I do on a daily/weekly/monthly basis. Also, one of the biggest parts of 101-in-1001 is that you recognize that you&#039;ll fail to accomplish a fair amount of what&#039;s on your list; knowing that the world won&#039;t implode if I don&#039;t manage to cross every single thing off makes it easier to get things done, somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree <i>vociferously</i>. I made one of these lists a month ago, and I&#8217;m slowly but steadily crossing things off, and about 20% of the tasks are things that I do on a daily/weekly/monthly basis. Also, one of the biggest parts of 101-in-1001 is that you recognize that you&#8217;ll fail to accomplish a fair amount of what&#8217;s on your list; knowing that the world won&#8217;t implode if I don&#8217;t manage to cross every single thing off makes it easier to get things done, somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
